Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateOhioIntroduced
SB 106: Regulate the ownership of electric vehicle charging stations
Bill Reineke
SB 106 status: Introduced — Effective 9/23/26 (updated Sep 23, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
50OUT OF 100
Score:50/100 civic fit — mixed
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 50/100
Constitutionality50%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill enacts several new sections of the Ohio Revised Code (4933.51 through 4933.59) to establish a regulatory framework for the ownership of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations.
Who is affected
Public electric utilities, private EV charging station developers, and electricity consumers.
Requirements and enforcement
The bill mandates compliance with new statutory requirements regarding who may own and operate EV charging infrastructure.
Costs and funding
Not stated in the available source.
When it takes effect
The bill became effective on September 23, 2026.
Potential benefits
Potential for increased regulatory certainty for utilities and standardized infrastructure development.
Risks and tradeoffs
Risk of utility monopolization and potentially higher consumer costs, depending on how ownership is structured.
What is still unknown
The specific constraints placed on utility ownership versus private ownership and any associated consumer protection provisions.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Establishes a clearer regulatory framework for ownership.
- Provides market certainty for electric utility investment.
- Potentially streamlines infrastructure deployment timelines.
Risks
- Risk of creating monopoly power for utilities in charging.
- Potential for higher electricity rates if costs are socialized.
- Possible reduction in private sector competition.
Society
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis scope
Source provided is limited to a brief legislative abstract.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.