Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateOregonIntroduced
SB 1517: Relating to civil litigation; and declaring an emergency.
Unknown Sponsor
SB 1517 status: Introduced — Effective date, April 7, 2026 (updated Apr 14, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
40OUT OF 100
Score:40/100 civic fit
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 60/100
Constitutionality70%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
] Provides that an operator may require a participant in a sport, fitness or recreational activity to release the operator for claims for ordinary negligence under certain circumstances. Specifies certain types of claims that may not be waived. Provides that in a claim for damages for injuries sustained while a participant is engaged in a sport, fitness or recreational activity, whether a risk is inherent to the activity is a question of law. Declares an emergency, effective on passage.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
40%
Benefits
- Reduced litigation costs for recreational businesses
- Improved insurance premium stability for operators
- Clearer contractual expectations for participation
Risks
- Financial burden shifted to injured participants
- Reduced incentive for operators to maintain safety infrastructure
- Potential for predatory or overbroad waiver drafting
Society
Mixed / Neutral
40%
Benefits
- Maintains access to recreation by controlling liability
- Establishes clear legal boundaries for participants
- Reduces time-consuming litigation processes
Risks
- Limits legal rights of citizens to pursue injury claims
- Loss of jury review in negligence cases
- Disproportionate impact on injured participants
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Mixed / Neutral
40%
Benefits
- Increased judicial efficiency via legal determinations
- Provides statutory clarity on inherent risks
- Reduced court backlog for civil litigation
Risks
- Shifts decision-making power from public juries to judges
- Limits public participation in the justice process
- Reduces oversight of commercial safety practices
Public Health & Safety
Mixed / Neutral
40%
Benefits
- Sustains availability of community sports and fitness
- Standardizes risk disclosures to participants
- Supports the economic viability of health facilities
Risks
- Potential degradation of safety standards at facilities
- Disincentivizes proactive risk mitigation by owners
- Financial barrier to seeking damages for injuries
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a summary and does not include full legislative text.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.