Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Liz Hanbidge
HB 507 status: Introduced — Laid on the table (updated Sep 8, 2026).

Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
Bill summary
This proposed law aims to make baby food safer by: * **Testing:** Requiring companies to test baby food for dangerous heavy metals. * **Safety Limits:** Banning products that contain unsafe levels of those metals. * **Labeling:** Requiring clear labels so parents know what is in the food. * **Enforcement:** Giving the Department of Agriculture the job of making sure these rules are followed. The bill is currently being reviewed by the House of Representatives.
Modeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Mixed / Neutral
Positive outlook
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Positive outlook
Positive outlook
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Implementation depends entirely on the administrative capacity and funding provided to the Department of Agriculture.
!Analysis scope
Source material is limited to an OpenStates summary without full bill text.

Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.

Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.

Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.