Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateSouth DakotaEnacted
HB 1038: allow the Public Utilities Commission to assess actual costs to data centers that are customers of public utilities.
Commerce and Energy
HB 1038 status: Enacted — Signed by the Governor on 2026-03-30 H.J. 579 (updated Mar 30, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
60OUT OF 100
Score:60/100 civic fit
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 55/100
Constitutionality90%
Bipartisan70%
Public opinion75%
Bill summary
What changes
HB 1038 authorizes the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to assess the 'actual costs' of providing utility service to data centers.
Who is affected
Data centers operating as customers of public utilities, utility providers, and the Public Utilities Commission.
Requirements and enforcement
The PUC is empowered to determine and collect costs associated with service delivery that were previously shifted or not fully recovered.
Costs and funding
Data centers will likely face higher utility-related expenses, effectively removing implicit subsidies formerly provided by standard rate structures.
When it takes effect
The bill was signed by the Governor on March 30, 2026.
Potential benefits
Ensures that utility infrastructure costs are borne by the high-load industrial consumers requiring them, protecting residential and smaller business ratepayers from potential rate hikes.
Risks and tradeoffs
Potential for increased operating costs for the tech sector, possible migration of investment to other states, and legal challenges over the definition and methodology of 'actual costs'.
What is still unknown
The exact methodology the PUC will use to define and audit 'actual costs' and the long-term impact on the growth of South Dakota's technology sector.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
60%
Benefits
- Prevents cross-subsidization of data center infrastructure by residential/small business ratepayers
- Ensures utilities recover the full cost of infrastructure expansion necessitated by large loads
- Establishes a mechanism to recoup actual utility costs from high-load industrial customers
Risks
- Increases operating expenses for data center facilities
- Creates potential uncertainty for tech businesses planning site expansions
- May lead to increased cost-of-service litigation between utilities and data centers
Society
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Technology Industry
Mixed / Neutral
45%
Benefits
- Standardizes cost-assessment expectations for data center developers
- Increases transparency regarding utility-related infrastructure investments
- Clarifies the role of the Public Utilities Commission in cost allocation
Risks
- Higher electricity costs could threaten the financial viability of current operations
- Increases overhead for firms that rely on low utility rates for their business model
- Compliance with PUC cost-allocation assessments may require more detailed reporting
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
75%
Benefits
- Empowers the Public Utilities Commission to provide greater oversight on utility costs
- Prevents private utility contracts from operating without public regulatory review
- Creates a public process for reviewing infrastructure cost assessments
Risks
- Places increased administrative burden on the Public Utilities Commission
- Could lead to complex, prolonged legal challenges over rate-setting methodology
- Depends on the adequacy of Commission staff to review complex utility cost models
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.
Analysis scope
Source material is limited to a brief summary; specific statutory definitions of 'actual costs' are not provided.
04
Where it stands
Official recordSigned by the Governor on 2026-03-30 H.J. 579
- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeComplete
- Chamber votesComplete
- Final agreementComplete
- GovernorComplete
- EnactedComplete
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.