Local Government, General - As enacted, requires a local government responsib... explained: HB 2552 | Vote Impact

StateTennesseeIntroduced

HB 2552: Local Government, General - As enacted, requires a local government responsible for reviewing a development application, development plan, or a site inspection submitted by a developer for the purpose of developing real property in this state, within 60 business days of the submission, to approve the application, plan, or site inspection or add the submission to the next available agenda of either the planning commission or the governing body; makes other related changes. - Amends TCA Title 7.

William Lamberth

Source

OpenStates

Confidence

Low

Analysis basis

OpenStates summary

01

What this bill does

Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.

Overall Score

75OUT OF 100

Score:75/100 civic fit

Risk:Moderate Risk

Impact:Moderate Impact 70/100

Earlier scoring method. Reanalyze to use the sector calculation.

Constitutionality90%

Bipartisan70%

Public opinion60%

Bill summary

Local Government, General - As enacted, requires a local government responsible for reviewing a development application, development plan, or a site inspection submitted by a developer for the purpose of developing real property in this state, within 60 business days of the submission, to approve the application, plan, or site inspection or add the submission to the next available agenda of either the planning commission or the governing body; makes other related changes. - Amends TCA Title 7.. Currently in House.

02

Impact analysis

✦ AI analysis

Modeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.

Environment

Mixed / Neutral

45%

Benefits

Faster development approvals may concentrate construction activity in established areas

Risks

Reduced time for thorough environmental review of development plans
Potential for oversight gaps during rushed site inspections

Economy

Positive outlook

85%

Benefits

Reduces development delays and administrative bottlenecks
Lowers financing costs by accelerating project approval timelines

Risks

Mandated deadlines may increase staffing and administrative burdens on local governments
May disadvantage under-resourced rural jurisdictions

Society

Mixed / Neutral

50%

Benefits

No direct social benefit identified

Risks

No direct social benefit or harm identified beyond administrative operational changes

Technology Industry

Not scored in this analysis.

Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.

Civic Accountability

Not scored in this analysis.

Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.

Public Health & Safety

Not scored in this analysis.

Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.

03

How trustworthy & consequential it is

Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.

Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.

Source note

LegiScan returned a PDF-only document. PDF extraction is not enabled in this build, so the pipeline used a safer fallback.

Analysis scope

Analysis based solely on abstract and enactment status

04

Where it stands

Official record

IntroducedCurrent
CommitteeUpcoming
Chamber votesUpcoming
Final agreementUpcoming
GovernorUpcoming
EnactedUpcoming

05

How it affects your district

✦ Personalized

Set your location

Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.

Your Representatives

Your representatives appear here once you add your location.

06

Take action

Contact your representatives

Let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share your view

Join the discussion and see what others are saying.

Track this bill

Stay updated on progress and changes.