Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateTexasIntroduced
HB 22: Relating to the authority of the comptroller to provide funding for the deployment and operation of certain emergency communication equipment.
Greg Bonnen
HB 22 status: Introduced — Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal (updated Apr 15, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
69OUT OF 100
Score:69/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 55/100
Constitutionality95%
Bipartisan70%
Public opinion80%
Bill summary
What changes
The legislation authorizes the state comptroller to provide funding specifically for the acquisition and operation of emergency communication equipment, such as radios for first responders.
Who is affected
State agencies, the Comptroller of Public Accounts, and local first responder organizations that utilize emergency communication networks.
Requirements and enforcement
The bill creates a framework for state-funded procurement and operational support for communication technology.
Costs and funding
Not stated in the available source; specific appropriations or funding sources are not defined in the abstract.
When it takes effect
Introduced and currently under discussion as of April 2026.
Potential benefits
Potential for improved coordination among emergency responders and enhanced reliability of safety communications during disasters.
Risks and tradeoffs
Lack of transparency requirements, audit protocols, or specific fiscal caps in the provided summary.
What is still unknown
The total budget impact, the specific technologies intended for purchase, and the criteria for selecting eligible jurisdictions or agencies.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Positive outlook
65%
Benefits
- Provides direct state capital for public safety infrastructure upgrades
- Supports procurement for advanced telecommunications equipment
- Improves disaster response economic resilience
Risks
- Creates long-term maintenance costs for state-funded equipment
- Potential for inefficient allocation without specified cost controls
- Reliance on state comptroller for complex equipment procurement
Society
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Technology Industry
Positive outlook
60%
Benefits
- Incentivizes upgrades to modern emergency radio standards
- Expands market for secure, resilient communication technology
- Promotes integration of improved alert systems
Risks
- Technical requirements may favor established legacy incumbents
- Potential lack of transparency in technology selection processes
- Risk of vendor lock-in for critical emergency infrastructure
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
65%
Benefits
- Clarifies legal authority for the Comptroller to manage emergency funds
- Establishes a defined conduit for state support of local agencies
- Centralizes responsibility for emergency communication readiness
Risks
- Abstract lacks defined audit requirements for disbursed funds
- Potential for executive overreach in fund disbursement criteria
- Insufficient detail on legislative reporting requirements
Public Health & Safety
Positive outlook
85%
Benefits
- Ensures reliable communication for first responders in crises
- Decreases response times through improved interoperability
- Enhances general public safety during disaster events
Risks
- Operational failure of new systems could compromise safety
- Training gaps could render new equipment ineffective
- Over-reliance on centralized systems may create single points of failure
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Absence of specific cost-control or audit provisions in the summary.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a summary; full text of the bill is not available.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.