Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Tan Parker
SB 11 status: Introduced — Effective on (updated Sep 17, 2025).

Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
Bill summary
The bill introduces an affirmative defense in criminal prosecutions for individuals who were coerced into committing crimes as a direct result of being victims of human trafficking or forced prostitution.
Individuals currently or formerly involved in human trafficking or compelled prostitution who face criminal charges for coerced actions.
Defendants would likely need to demonstrate, through an affirmative defense, that their criminal actions were the direct result of coercion by a trafficker.
Not stated in the available source.
Effective date not specified.
Provides a legal mechanism to prevent the criminalization of trauma-informed victims, facilitating their ability to exit trafficking environments.
Potential for inconsistent application of the defense across different judicial districts and the requirement for legal counsel to effectively navigate the affirmative defense process.
The specific definition of 'coerced' and the level of evidentiary proof required for the affirmative defense are not provided in the source.
Modeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Positive outlook
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Positive outlook
Positive outlook
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
The effectiveness of the affirmative defense will depend heavily on the specific criteria and evidentiary standards defined in the full text.
!Analysis scope
Source provided is a brief legislative abstract, not full bill text.

Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.

Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.

Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.