Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateWest VirginiaIntroduced
HB 5690: Supplemental appropriation, Adjutant General
Vernon Criss
HB 5690 status: Introduced — Chapter 47, Acts, Regular Session, 2026 (updated Aug 13, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
50OUT OF 100
Score:50/100 civic fit — mixed
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Low Impact 20/100
Constitutionality90%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
The bill provides additional funding for the West Virginia Adjutant General's office.
Who is affected
The West Virginia Adjutant General's office.
Requirements and enforcement
Not stated in the available source.
Costs and funding
An unspecified supplemental amount of state funds.
When it takes effect
Effective upon enactment (Chapter 47).
Potential benefits
Supports state-level military administrative activities.
Risks and tradeoffs
No clear information on the intended use of the supplemental funds is provided in the source.
What is still unknown
The specific purpose, amount, and justification for the supplemental appropriation remain unknown.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Provides supplemental funding for agency operations
- Addresses identified budget shortfalls
- Supports state military administration capacity
Risks
- Increases aggregate state expenditures
- Lacks detail on specific resource allocation
- Limits clarity on fund utilization
Society
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Provides formal legislative record of funding
- Requires legislative approval for supplemental spend
- Enables standard public fiscal oversight
Risks
- Abstract provides minimal detail on budget necessity
- Limits public insight into specific operational spending
- Lacks clear performance metrics or audit requirements
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Lack of transparency regarding the specific allocation of funds.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a highly limited summary abstract.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.