Environment
Critical outlook
40%
Benefits
- regulatory certainty for existing facilities
Risks
- potential increase in noise and traffic nuisance
- reduced community recourse for environmental disturbances
StateWisconsinTo Governor
AB 880: Relating to: nuisance actions against racing facilities.
Jeff Mursau
AB 880 status: To Governor — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (updated May 13, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
35OUT OF 100
Score:35/100 civic fit
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 55/100
Earlier scoring method. Reanalyze to use the sector calculation.
Constitutionality70%
Bipartisan40%
Public opinion30%
Bill summary
The bill shifts legal protections away from residential property owners toward commercial racing facilities by limiting nuisance litigation.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Positive outlook
60%
Benefits
- protects racing facilities from litigation costs
- stabilizes business operations for track owners
Risks
- negative impact on neighboring property values
- potential increase in costs for surrounding residential homeowners
Society
Critical outlook
40%
Benefits
- preservation of local racing entertainment venues
Risks
- erodes the rights of neighbors to seek redress for nuisance
- diminishes neighborhood quality of life protections
Technology Industry
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Civic Accountability
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
Public Health & Safety
Not scored in this analysis.
Generate analysis again to evaluate this sector.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Significantly limits legal avenues for residents to address noise and traffic issues
Analysis scope
Analysis based on summary abstract only
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeComplete
- Chamber votesComplete
- Final agreementComplete
- GovernorCurrent
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.