AB 880: Relating to: nuisance actions against racing facilities.
AB 880 status: To Governor — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (updated May 13, 2026).
OpenStates summary
What this bill does
Overall score


Bill summary
OfficialThis bill would make it harder for neighbors to sue local racetracks for being a "nuisance" (such as complaints about noise or traffic). It is currently being debated in the state legislature.
Key analysis
Impact analysis
Environment
Benefits
- regulatory certainty for existing facilities
Risks
- potential increase in noise and traffic nuisance
- reduced community recourse for environmental disturbances
Economy
Benefits
- protects racing facilities from litigation costs
- stabilizes business operations for track owners
Risks
- negative impact on neighboring property values
- potential increase in costs for surrounding residential homeowners
Society
Benefits
- preservation of local racing entertainment venues
Risks
- erodes the rights of neighbors to seek redress for nuisance
- diminishes neighborhood quality of life protections
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
lowlow
Analysis status
OpenStates summary
Significantly limits legal avenues for residents to address noise and traffic issues
Analysis based on summary abstract only
Where it stands
Introduced
CompleteCommittee
CompleteFloor
CompleteGovernor
CurrentFailed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Enacted
UpcomingHow it affects your district
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.