Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateWisconsinIntroduced
AJR 102: Relating to: prohibiting governmental entity discrimination (second consideration).
Dave Murphy
AJR 102 status: Introduced — Published 5-26-2026. Enrolled Joint Resolution 11 (updated May 26, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
Not enough information
Score:Not enough information
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 40/100
Constitutionality70%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
What changes
This joint resolution serves as a second consideration for a constitutional amendment aimed at prohibiting discrimination by government entities.
Who is affected
All Wisconsin state government entities and the citizens interacting with them.
Requirements and enforcement
Requires government entities to adhere to a constitutional standard prohibiting discrimination.
Costs and funding
Not stated in the available source.
When it takes effect
This is a second consideration, marking a late stage in the constitutional amendment process.
Potential benefits
Potential for increased government transparency and fairness in public-facing interactions.
Risks and tradeoffs
Ambiguity in the legal definition of 'discrimination' may lead to interpretive challenges in practice.
What is still unknown
The specific text of the amendment and the practical administrative mechanisms for enforcement remain unclear.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Society
Not enough information
Not enough information to score this sector.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
60%
Benefits
- Establishes a baseline against government discrimination
- Formalizes equal treatment as a constitutional priority
- Provides potential legal recourse for aggrieved parties
Risks
- Lack of definitions for discrimination creates legal ambiguity
- Risk of increased litigation regarding government policy
- Potential for disparate implementation across agencies
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
The scope of 'discrimination' in a constitutional context is highly dependent on judicial interpretation.
Analysis scope
Source provided is a summary abstract with minimal detail.
04
Where it stands
Official record- IntroducedCurrent
- CommitteeUpcoming
- Chamber votesUpcoming
- Final agreementUpcoming
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.