Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateWyomingVetoed
SF 119: Strategic investments and projects account-repeal-2.
Larry Hicks
SF 119 status: Vetoed — Governor Vetoed SEA No. 0029 (updated Mar 9, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
50OUT OF 100
Score:50/100 civic fit — mixed
Risk:Moderate Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 60/100
Constitutionality100%
Bipartisan50%
Public opinion50%
Bill summary
AN ACT relating to public funds; repealing the strategic investments and projects account; providing for the transfer from and the reversion of funds from the strategic investments and projects account; revising limits on budget recommendations; making conforming amendments; amending the disposition of investment earnings and deposits as specified; repealing obsolete provisions; and providing for an effective date.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Simplification of state fund management
- Redirection of idle funds into general pools
- Reduction of legislative budget complexity
Risks
- Loss of dedicated funding mechanisms for strategic projects
- Reduced long-term flexibility for strategic investments
- Potential disruption to ongoing project planning
Society
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Mixed / Neutral
50%
Benefits
- Increases clarity of state budget structures
- Reduces statutory clutter for better oversight
- Standardizes investment earnings reporting protocols
Risks
- Reduced transparency in tracking specific strategic funds
- Decreased legislative oversight of project-specific allocations
- Executive budget recommendation limits may constrain adaptability
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Repealing dedicated accounts may obscure the final disposition of specific previously earmarked funds.
Analysis scope
Source provided is an abstract; full text of budget reallocations is unavailable.
04
Where it stands
Official recordGovernor Vetoed SEA No. 0029
- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeComplete
- Chamber votesComplete
- Final agreementComplete
- GovernorUpcoming
- EnactedUpcoming
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.