Environment
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
StateWyomingEnacted
SF 90: School facilities-use fees.
Evie Brennan
SF 90 status: Enacted — Assigned Chapter Number 65 (updated Mar 6, 2026).
Source
OpenStates
Confidence
Low
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
01
What this bill does
Official summary alongside an AI-generated read on where it stands and why.
Overall Score
70OUT OF 100
Score:70/100 civic fit
Risk:Low Risk
Impact:Moderate Impact 50/100
Constitutionality90%
Bipartisan70%
Public opinion80%
Bill summary
This act provides that rental fees charged by a school district for the use of school district property shall not exceed the hourly rate of personnel, equipment, utility and supply costs actually incurred by the district for use of the property. School districts shall provide, upon request, itemized statements identifying the district's personnel, equipment, supply and utility costs incurred not more than fifteen (15) days after the request for an itemized statement. School districts shall not require the renting entity to be a nonprofit organization or have any other specific corporate status. This act has an applicability section that indicates that the act shall not be construed to impair any contract or agreement entered into before July 1, 2026.
02
Impact analysis
✦ AI analysisModeled effects across six domains, estimated from bill text and comparable legislation.
Economy
Positive outlook
75%
Benefits
- Limits rental fees to actual incurred costs
- Reduces financial barriers for small business renters
- Increases market transparency for facilities
Risks
- Reduces potential revenue streams for school districts
- Adds administrative burden for cost tracking
- Potential for operational funding gaps
Society
Positive outlook
70%
Benefits
- Broader access to public school facilities
- Eliminates exclusionary corporate status mandates
- Increases community utility of tax-funded buildings
Risks
- Potential for increased facility wear and tear
- May lead to scheduling conflicts with school activities
- Requires additional staffing for facility oversight
Technology Industry
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
Civic Accountability
Positive outlook
65%
Benefits
- Mandates itemized statement delivery
- Forces transparent disclosure of cost structures
- Establishes a firm 15-day response requirement
Risks
- Administrative burden of preparing itemized reports
- Relies on proactive requests for transparency
- Limited enforcement mechanisms for cost calculation accuracy
Public Health & Safety
No direct effect
Neutral — no direct effect identified.
Benefits
- No material direct effect identified.
Risks
- No material direct effect identified.
03
How trustworthy & consequential it is
Sourcing already shown above, this is what the analysis found worth flagging.
Source
OpenStates
Official bill text or data from OpenStates.
Confidence
Low
Information is limited or incomplete.
Analysis basis
OpenStates summary
Source used for this bill's analysis.
Source note
Districts may face increased administrative overhead to track granular costs.
Analysis scope
Source provided is an abstract; full text analysis not possible.
04
Where it stands
Official recordAssigned Chapter Number 65
- IntroducedComplete
- CommitteeComplete
- Chamber votesComplete
- Final agreementComplete
- GovernorComplete
- EnactedComplete
05
How it affects your district
✦ Personalized
Set your location
Add your district to see how this bill may affect your community and who to contact.
Your Representatives
Your representatives appear here once you add your location.
06
Take action
Contact your representatives
Let them know how you feel about this bill.
Share your view
Join the discussion and see what others are saying.
Track this bill
Stay updated on progress and changes.